Paulo de Vries · Senior Product Designer × CRO · builds AI · Amsterdam

I design products that convert, prove it with experiments, and build the AI inside them.

Ten years making brands convert — Telegraaf, NRC, dentsu. Then I taught myself to build the AI, and got curious about a newer question: how to get cited by ChatGPT, not just ranked on Google.

Get in touch CV LinkedIn

10 yrssenior CRO & product design 700+monthly conversions, one business 2 yrsbuilding AI agent systems

Experience: Mediahuis (Telegraaf, NRC, Dumpert) · dentsu · Contentsquare-certified · Design Academy Eindhoven.

Two crafts, one operator

Most people do one of these. The whole value is in the overlap — design the experience, prove it converts, then build the AI behind it.

Conversion & experimentation. A decade of A/B tests and conversion programs at Mediahuis and dentsu, Contentsquare-certified. I analyze the funnel end to end — where's the friction? — and prove what moves people with experiments, not opinions. I built our A/B-test builder and the group's Experimentation Hub, where every test plan and analysis lives. The craft I've been paid for since 2016.

AI systems I build. AcePilot, a self-improving multi-agent OS I wrote, runs unattended behind a guardrails layer it can't prompt its way past. I build the AI itself, not a wrapper around it.

AI visibility (GEO). I get pages cited by ChatGPT and Perplexity, down at the level of crawler logs and citations, and have been at it solo for two years. I've gotten a site's visitors to double, from a small base, from AI answers, not Google.

How I build

A build-measure-learn loop run with a CRO's discipline: every change is a hypothesis, not an opinion — shipped behind guardrails, then proven two ways before it's kept.

How I build — a build-measure-learn loop, human and agent at every step A conversion-style experimentation loop. An idea becomes a hypothesis; human and agent build it behind guardrails, then take one of two paths — a controlled A/B test for changes worth testing, or a quick fix shipped directly that skips straight to learning. Tested changes go live to users and are measured two ways — A/B for what works, user signal for why; both feed learning, then a decision to keep, iterate, or kill; the winner loops back as the next hypothesis. Human and agent are present at every step. Human × Agent present at every step A/B-test loop quick fix Idea Hypothesis prove it, don't assume Build human + agent · guardrails Users live Measure A/B → what works · users → why Learn Decide keep · iterate · kill

The discipline is the old one: never trust what you can't measure. What's new is running it with agents — at speed, at scale.

End to end, one person

The loop runs fast because I don't hand off the middle. I write the hypothesis, design it, ship the tracking, run the test, read the data, and work in the dev team's repo instead of throwing tickets over the wall.

Product & experimentation — Jira · A/B testing · Contentsquare (certified).  Design — Figma.  Measurement — Google Tag Manager · GA4 · Search Console; I implement my own tracking, so an experiment never waits on a developer.  Build & ship — GitLab, and AI I write myself: Claude / Claude Code, MCP, autonomous agents.

Selected work

What I'm betting on

Building got cheap; attention got expensive. The brands that win will convert the visitor — and get cited by the AI that sent them.— my operating thesis

Search is splitting in two: Google's blue links, and the AI answers quietly replacing them. I've spent ten years on conversion and two on the AI. The overlap is the whole game, and very few people work in both.

The short version

Designer by training (Design Academy Eindhoven), but I always cared less how things looked than whether they worked. Ten years made me a senior conversion specialist at Mediahuis and dentsu, proving it with experiments, not opinions. When AI arrived I didn't optimise around it. I taught myself to build it: an agent OS (AcePilot) and an MCP product. Now both crafts are one job, part senior CRO and part design engineer: design the experience, prove it converts, build the AI behind it.

Writing

Questions

Who is Paulo de Vries?
A senior conversion-rate optimization (CRO) specialist and product designer in Amsterdam, with ten years at Mediahuis (Telegraaf, NRC, Dumpert) and dentsu, Contentsquare-certified, Design Academy Eindhoven. He taught himself to build AI, and created AcePilot, a self-improving multi-agent system. The edge is the overlap: I design products that convert, prove it with experiments, and build the AI inside them.
What do you actually do?
Two crafts most people keep separate: senior CRO + product/UX design, and building AI systems. Designing experiences, proving they convert through experimentation, and building the AI behind them — including getting pages cited by AI answer engines.
Can you own a product end to end?
Yes, it's how I work. I write the hypothesis, design the solution, implement the tracking, run the experiment, read the data, and work in the dev team's repo, instead of handing off tickets. Discovery, roadmap, experimentation and stakeholder reporting are the work I've done for a decade, under CRO and design titles rather than "product owner".
What's your experience?
Senior CRO Specialist / UX Designer at Mediahuis (2023–present), UX/CRO consultant at dentsu (2022), Product Designer & Marketer at JobBoost (2017–2021). Contentsquare-certified. BA, Design Academy Eindhoven.
How can I reach you?
Email [email protected] or LinkedIn. I work at the intersection of AI and conversion.